AUSTIN (KXAN) - After fighting for the right to marry, Angelique Naylor is nowfighting for the right to divorce. And, while Texas has heard a fewsame-sex divorce cases, Naylor's is the first where the spouse iscontesting the legal split.
Back in 2004, Naylor and her partner went to Massachusetts toget married, the only state at the time that recognized same-sexmarriage. The Texas couple then adopted a boy, built businessestogether and bought joint property.
Five years later, they are now going through divorce court; atleast that is what Naylor hopes.
"It's not about special rights," said Naylor. "It's about equalrights. I want my divorce like the 15 divorce cases that Iwitnessed today between men and women."
However, the opposition to Naylor's divorce is not coming fromthe courts or even politicians just yet, but rather her spouse.According to Naylor, her wife is arguing that the divorce shouldnot be recognized since same-sex marriage in Texas is notlegal.
"On the day that we got married, she wanted equal rights," shesaid. "On the day that we adopted our child, she wanted equalrights. She's just trying to tell the judge she doesn't have todivide those assets with me."
Family law expert and equal rights activist, Anne Wynne, saidthe decision Texas judges make in these cases in the coming yearswill have major implications for the state.
"It has huge implications," she said. "It means they get treatedlike every other citizen in this state."
However, Wynne admits that Naylor's spouse has some heavyarsenal in her case - the Texas constitution.
"On the books right now, we have a law that said same-sex peoplecannot marry, nor will this state recognize a marriage of same-sexcouples that came from another state," she said.
In Dallas, a judge granted a same-sex couple the right todivorce. AttorneyGeneral Greg Abbott quickly stepped in, however, and said thestate wouldn't recognize same-sex divorce. The office laterreleased a statement regarding this case:
"Under the law and constitution of the State of Texas, marriage is a union between one man and one woman. As a result, when two people of the same sex seek to terminate a relationship that they entered into in another state, the proper legal mechanism is voidance--not divorce. In the Austin case, one of the two parties is properly following Texas law and is seeking to void their out-of-state relationship. That is contrasted by the Dallas case, where both parties improperly sought a divorce--which left the State no choice but to intervene and defend Texas law. Because one of the parties in the Austin case is properly pursuing voidance, this office will closely monitor the case and, if necessary, take appropriate steps to defend the Texas Constitution."
"More states will be legalizing same-sex marriage," said Wynne."As more and more of those people move here, we're going to havethis issue come up over and over."
As for Naylor, she said she never meant to make history.
"I'm just a citizen who wants to get a divorce, and it's goingto be a little harder for me to do that."
Mack Brown's attorney and the university's new athletics director say the Texas coach has not resigned, denying a report that Brown was ready to step down after 16 seasons with the Longhorns.
A large majority of the crowd that poured into Austin City Hall on Tuesday night was disappointed with the Parks and Recreation Department's decision to approve a smaller off leash area at Auditorium Shores.
The top prosecutor in Travis County found herself on the witness stand Tuesday to answer questions about her professional and personal history along with her history of alcohol.
A proposal to build a highway in south Austin is getting mixed reviews from neighbors.
An Austin man has been convicted in a human smuggling case in which a teen says she was forced to wear revealing clothes and sexually assaulted while bound for New Jersey.
An historic early December cold spell is slowly waning, but temperatures will remain well below average for a couple more days.