Quintana fired

Leonardo Quintana_20100112143742_JPG

Leonardo Quintana

Leonardo Quintana_20091104105450_JPG

Senior Austin Police Officer Leonardo Quintana (Ralph Barrera/AMERICAN-STATESMAN)

  • Nathaniel Sanders shooting
Quintana acquitted on two charges
Quintana acquitted on two charges

Former Austin Police Officer Leonardo Quintana was acquitted …

Complex battling crime two years later
Complex battling crime two years later

Austin police have been working to clean up the Walnut Creek …

Dead teen's mom 'trying to hold on'
Dead teen's mom 'trying to hold on'

The mother of 18-year-old Gerrell Earls, shot and killed at the…

Warrant issued in killing of teenager
Warrant issued in killing of teenager

Police have issued an arrest warrant in the pre-dawn Friday …

Price of settlements adds up for city
Price of settlements adds up for city

Backers of the decision to settle lawsuits over police …

Advertisement

Former APD officer fights to regain job

Leonardo Quintana is in a Civil Service Hearing

Updated: Thursday, 02 Sep 2010, 6:45 PM CDT
Published : Thursday, 02 Sep 2010, 9:35 AM CDT

AUSTIN (KXAN) - Former Austin police officer Leonardo Quintana is fighting to get his job back during a civil service hearing Thursday morning.

Austin Police Department Chief Art Acevedo in May fired Quintana , 33, following his arrest on Jan. 11 on charges of driving while intoxicated in Leander.

Earlier on the day of his arrest, Quintana underwent cross-examination for six hours as part of the federal lawsuit related to the killing of Nathaniel Sanders, II, who was 18 years old.

Quintana shot and killed Sanders in May 2009 after responding to an early morning incident at the Walnut Creek apartments at 6409 Springdale Road .

While a Travis County grand jury cleared Quintana in August 2009 of criminal charges for using deadly force in the shooting, he was suspended three months later for 15 days for violating the department's dash cam policy after he failed to turn it on the morning of the fatal shooting.

Quintana's civil service hearing, which began at 9 a.m. Thursday, is open to the public and is at the city of Austin Human Resources Learning and Resource Center .

You can follow live on tweets on Chris Sadeghi's twitter page.

9:10 AM

Hearing officer Louise Wolitz starts the proceedings by setting the ground rules for the civil service hearing. The city has the burden of proof to show their discipline of Quintana is justified.

After both cases are made, she will have 30 days to make her decision.

City attorney Michael Cronig tells Wolitz by law, she has only 3 courses of action:

1. to return Quintana to the force

2. a 15 day suspension

3. uphold the indefinite suspension.

He then says evidence will show the indefinite suspension handed down by APD is justified.

Quintana's attorney Tom Stribling then makes his opening statement and says based on the evidence and prior disciplinary cases for DWI, the punishment does not fit the crime.

9:25 AM

Internal affairs investigator Sgt. Justin Newsom is the first witness.

He testifies on the night Quintana was arrested for DWI, he had been drinking at a sushi restaurant in south Austin and later at a strip club and had an estimated blood-alcohol level of .192.

According to a deposition with Quintana, he admitted to having between 5 and 10 beers along with shots of sake.

Newsom says Quintana made a conscious decision to drive knowing the effects of the alcohol on his ability to operate a vehicle.

Again quoting deposition, Newsom says Quintana had an opportunity to stay at a fellow officer's house, but tried to drive home because he was accompanied by a female officer and thought "things were going to progress" with the female.

He acknowledged it was a risk to drive and the stress from the deposition from the Nathanial Sanders shooting did not figure into his decision to drive.

10:00 AM

In the two mile drive from home, Quintana was involved in an accident. He failed the sobriety test.

According to a deposition with Quintana, he says he had been drinking increasingly more while on administrative leave after the shooting and had been seeking professional help about his drinking problem.

Cronig ends his questioning by confirming with Newsom that the DWI arrest did not make Quintana nor APD look very good in the wake of the Nathanial Sanders shooting.

10:15 AM

Stribling begins his questioning by asking how many APD officers were in the party of eight at the sushi restaurant with Quintana. Stribling says all but two were officers with the department. Stribling then asks why those other officers were not investigated for drinking and driving.

Newsom says they were not investigated because a complaint was never brought to him for those officers.

Stribling continues  to try and paint other officers as irresponsible the night of the DWI offense and they could have prevented the accident from happening.

He wraps up his questioning by confirming Quintana initially did not want to go out that night and has been very cooperative with the investigation.

10:40 AM

Sgt. Stephen Fleming, Quintana's supervisor after he was reassigned from the shooting incident, is now testifying.

Fleming says they recommended Quintana speak with the professional about his drinking problem and the stress the situation following the shooting was causing him was evident.

Within a week of returning to his job, Quintana posted a picture on a social media site of him holding a handgun and the caption that said "back to work." Fleming says the posting was concerning considering the high profile incident in which Quintana had just been involved.

During this time, Quintana was invovled in a tumultuous relationship with a female officer at APD. Fleming had to give Quintana a memo asking him to stay away from the officer and it was the first time he had ever had to issue such a memo to an officer on staff.

Fleming says he believes Quintana made a conscious decision to drive that night knowing the risk and when Chief Art Acevedo asked about discipllinary action, Fleming felt a suspension between 16-90 days

would be appropriate and later recommended termination after thinking about the situation.

Poor judgement is a pattern Quintana had shown according to Fleming and that the officer did not seem to understand the reasons why he would be disciplined and was only looking at things from his side. That judgement is why Fleming felt Quintana should be terminated.

Fleming says it would be in the city's best interest not to re-instate Quintana and Cronig then passes the witness to Stribling.

11:05 AM

Stribling asks Fleming about the discipline handed down to Quintana for not activating his dashcam during the shooting incident. Fleming says at the time, he felt the discipline for that incident was excessive.

Fleming answers a question from Stribling confirming that not all DWI offenses from officers have resulted in an indefinite suspension, but adds he felt Quintana's suspension was justified.

11:25 AM

Lt. Jessica Robledo is now on the stand and says officers are held to a high standard, and when the Facebook picture of Quintana holding an AR-15 was discovered, she had a direct order drawn up. She spoke with Quintana about the picture and says it was a conversation neither one of them will forget.

Afteroon testimony

In the afternoon, the assistant chiefs and Chief Art Acevedo made similar testimony about Quintana's lack of judgment which should keep him from being re-instated.

Acevedo says after disciplinary action in 2006, Quintana vowed to never be make such mistakes again and proceeded to break that commitment multiple times.

When asked about the facebook posting, Acevedo and the other officers in Quintana's chain-of-command say it was very concerning and reflected poorly upon the department given the negative exposure caused by the Nathanial Sanders shooting.

The chief continuously said he considers the "totality of circumstances" when determining a punishment and that is why the discipline against Quintana was more serious than other officers who may have been arrested for DWI.

Acevedo says it is a big problem that Quintana made the decision to leave a safe place and attempt to drive home while intoxicated and the media coverage of his arrest reflected poorly on the department.

Quintana is expected to testify when the hearing resumes Friday.

Adam Loewy, the attorney for the Sanders family, was present to watch the proceedings and says the facebook picture was never made available to him.

"This is someone who killed a sleeping teenager and he is celebrating his first day back at work and shows no sensitivity to the situation.  That is the character of the person we are dealing with in this case," said Loewy.

Austin Police Officer Association President Wayne Vincent says the severity of Quintana's discipline was excessive and he deserves his job back. When asked about the facebook post, Vincent says it was not meant to be malicious or make light of the Sanders shooting.

"It was not his intent to make some cynical statment but that is how it is being viewed," said Vincent.

Loewy says the hearing shows the city and PD did not like Quintana and do not believe he is capable of being an officer and will have to say as much in the looming civil suit.

"(Quintana) is the horse they bet on. When they decided not to honor the settlement, this is the guy they wanted to take to the civil trial. We are confident we will prevail."

Advertisement

Site Tools

Advertisement