Tiny house_20100216181610_JPG

A sampling of some of the offerings at Texas Tiny Houses (Jim Swift/KXAN)

Farm house in Bastrop County, Texas_20100216181522_JPG

Chicken farmer Jules Assata lives with her partner in this 250 square foot house. (Jim Swift/KXAN)

Advertisement

Small house movement hits Central Texas

Tiny houses stress reuse and energy efficiency

Updated: Tuesday, 16 Feb 2010, 7:13 PM CST
Published : Wednesday, 17 Feb 2010, 2:16 AM CST

BASTROP COUNTY, Texas (KXAN) - The Latest

The recession driven tide of foreclosures in America is not about to let up any time soon. Five million homes, including condominiums are expected to eventually be foreclosed on over the next few years, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal Tuesday. The newspaper quoted from two new studies conducted by John Burns Real Estate Consulting, Inc. Besides the expected foreclosure cases, according to the studies, owners of another 2.7 million houses and condos are behind on their mortgage payments. Both studies said the foreclosure activity will continue downward pressure on home prices in parts of the country.

But what if the homeowners had bought small houses instead, really small houses? Granted, they would have had to make do with less space, but their mortgage payments would have been only a fraction of the owners' current obligations and they would have saved big on energy costs and taxes, as well. If that realization spreads throughout the marketplace, America could be in for a "small revolution." So say proponents of the something called the "Small House Movement."

The Chicken Farm

Near the Bastrop County community of Paige, Texas, organic chicken farmer Jules Assata makes her daily rounds through the wide open pens her birds call home. She coos to the critters quietly, spreading feed in long narrow bins and collecting dozens of eggs. Chores done, she walks back across the Shade of Green Farm to the home she shares with her partner, Susan Beckwith. A lot of sharing goes on in that house because it brings with it in the neighborhood of only 250 square feet, including loft, bedroom, living area, bathroom and kitchen.

"We didn't want to have a large footprint on the Earth, literally and figuratively," said Assata. "So our farm is, 'Shades of Green,' and we attempt to be as green as possible. And part of it was, how much space do we need take up on land that's never had a building on it."

The house has a rough-hewn look with cedar siding.

"We had the shell built and we finished the inside," Assata said. "The builder who built the shell, they're used to building more like hunting [cabins] or even garages."

The couple is fine with that. If there are any regrets at all, said Assata, they have to do with an escape valve.

"The single thing that we really see the need for is a separate space, office, bedroom, something so that if one needs to focus and the other sleep or something, that option exists," she said.

So the pair is exploring options.

"We have been talking to a young man who is interested in doing aquaponics farming on our land with us," said Assata, "who has grain bins that are eighteen feet in diameter and that he has made into a studio. So we may just use one of those."

Even so, Assata and Beckwith would still occupy less than 600 square feet, a far cry from the homestead claimed by most Americans.

Texas Tiny Houses

Southeast of the Shade of Green Farm, near Luling, Brad Kittel, the King of Texas Tiny Houses holds court over a manufacturing operation that is anything but tiny. Inside huge shelters, a half dozen really small homes are under construction and another half-dozen completed projects stand outside, waiting to be delivered to customers. They range in size from a mere 100 square feet or so to well over 300 square feet and they are a cornucopia of reused and recycled materials, including antique woods like loblolly pine, along with period fixtures like hinges and door knobs.

"If we could get people to consider all the dilapidated buildings out there that could be taken down and salvaged, creating salvage mining jobs, and then turn around and use them for salvage building, we could build the next generation of housing on a scale that's comparable to other countries around the world, small, tiny housing, and do it out of nothing but what is considered trash," said Kittel. "We can have a zero carbon footprint, practically, by doing salvage building and making it energy efficient, so we don't have to redo it over and over and over again over the next hundred years. It's the best trees we ever grew, the best hardware we ever made, the best glass we ever made, and it's all out there for free if we just go out there and pick it up and reuse it."

Well, the materials may be virtually free, but the finished tiny houses are not. An average offering may command $50,000. That price, however, is for human energy, something in plentiful supply these days.

"Right now, we've got 5 million unemployed people in this country; human energy is getting cheap," said Kittel. "If we can make housing that will last for 150 years instead of making a house that basically dissolves in 30, we're way ahead of the game."

A health element shoves its way into Kittel's argument, as well.

"There's no formaldehyde," he said. No out gassing, no VOCs, no vinyls, no plasticizers. You're moving into a healthy environment that's not going to attack your immune system the moment you

move in there.

Still, there is no getting around the fact that a Kittel house is small.

"It's tiny, in fact," he admitted. "But the whole principal is, if you look at Europe, if you look at Japan, if you look at London, if you look at New York City, tiny is expensive. And energy costs are going to go back up; we're not fooling ourselves; we're not going to have cheap energy like we did all these years.

"The Baby Boomers, we were the guys that were going to save the planet, remember? Yeah, what did we do? We burned it up faster than any other generation that ever came along. Well now we're figuring out that 'things' aren't so important; life is important. We give up living with our kids so we could have the big house. We worked our lives away getting a big house, then the kids move away and we have a big house that's not worth anything. We reached a point where everybody had to have a thousand square feet per person. It's not necessary. And so, the reality of this is getting people to rethink how we live. All of us are in that state now, you know, it's like we don't need the things; we don't need the giant house and so consequently, we're naturally downsizing. But it's got to accelerate and the economy is going to force the acceleration.

"Our generation, we all drank the Kool-Aid," he said, "cheap credit, cheap energy. Well, we'll just use as much of it as we need. Well, the piper's come, time to shrink, time to go down to the basics, time to have a house that you can live in until the day you die, instead of having to get kicked out because you can't pay the taxes, can't afford the energy bill."

The Rest of the Story

It might be well to remember that there are small houses and then again, there are small houses. A group called the "Small House Society," is quick to point out that a movie star living in 4,000 square feet instead of 10,000 is contributing to the movement. Likewise, a family of four crammed into 1500 square feet is making every bit as big a dent as Jules Assata and Sue Beckwith, which takes us back to A Shade of Green Farm.

"You know, abundance comes in a lot of ways, and square footage has nothing to do with real abundance," said Assata. "So it feels good to know we live light. It feels good to look around and see so much that is open and green and natural."

Advertisement

Site Tools

Advertisement